Book Banning
We believe that books should not be censored or banned.
Book banning is on the rise. We see efforts from groups on both the left and the right to stop the publication of, or restrict access to, certain books, because they fear the ideas expressed in them or they disapprove of the conduct of the authors. School boards and libraries have removed books, while recent state and local laws make it a crime for teachers and librarians to provide access to books that deal with sexuality, sexual identity, race, and other subjects, and attempts have even been made to prohibit their sale. Some groups have demanded that publishers not publish the books of certain authors whose political or social views they find objectionable. The intimidation of teachers, librarians, authors, editors, and publishers has also created a climate of fear that encourages self-censorship.
A healthy democracy requires vigorous literary debate, a diversity of ideas, and a tolerance for discourse that some find offensive or challenging. Regardless of one’s political, social, or religious views, suppressing books is anti-democratic, harmful, and a dangerous step toward autocracy.
Banned Words
We believe that no word should be banned.
Words are the raw materials from which writers build their essays, novels, poems, and stories. Writers choose their words carefully and the freedom to choose the right word is fundamental to good writing and to the freedom of expression that underpins any open society. Sadly, today we are faced with a new and intrusive form of censorship in the form of regulations that seek to condition grants on the elimination of certain words. The list of “banned words” reflects a clear ideological agenda—troublesome enough in and of itself—but it also sweeps so broadly that it would impede ordinary careful expression of a host of ideologically neutral topics. Not only progressive neologisms like “intersectionality” and “LGBTQ+” but also everyday words such as equity, bias, diversity, prejudice, inclusion, sex, and gender appear on lists of banned words. Just as a sculptor must be free to choose from marble, bronze, or wood, or a painter to select from oils, acrylics, or watercolors, a writer must be free to choose the right word to convey not only specific assertions, but also subtle connotations, elusive inflections, nuances of emphasis, and hints of implication. Banning words—especially commonly used and wholly inoffensive ones—not only reflects unjustified prejudice as to how a word might be used, but it will also bias writing in favor of clumsy prose and artless expression. The Authors Guild stands for the inclusion of a rich diversity of written words.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
We believe that racism and racist behavior has no place in the publishing industry, and we will continue to elevate the voices of Black writers and other writers of color who have too long been suppressed.
Read Our Commitment to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
Empowering Writers Against Sexual Harassment
We believe that empowering a multitude of voices is the way we can achieve the rich, diverse body of literature and stand firmly against the silencing of authors through sexual harassment or bias.
Read Our Statement Condemning Intimidation, Discrimination, and Harassment
Fair Payment
We believe authors should not be required to write or speak without compensation. Writers, like all professionals, should receive fair payment for their work.
Sometimes you may want to offer your services free, out of friendship or charity or public spirit. That is your choice. But no one is entitled to demand that you write or speak gratis—”for exposure,” as they say.
If you’d like support in declining an offer, here’s our statement for you to quote in your response. We stand behind you: Writers’ work is essential to our culture and should be valued and treated with respect.
The Authors Guild condemns the practice of nonpayment of writers by profitable publications. This practice is unethical and degrading, and it erodes the trust and integrity that should provide the foundation of a reputable publication.
Right to Distribute
We believe authors may choose how and by whom their works are copied, distributed, or otherwise made available to the public.
Copyright gives you control over the distribution of your work, in any and all channels and media.
There are “fair use” exceptions for small portions, for certain purposes, and the Authors Guild believes in the importance of the fair-use doctrine. But, for example, if an academic institution makes an electronic copy of your entire book freely available, this is a violation of copyright. It’s illegal unless you give them permission. When in doubt, ask us. We’re here to support you.
Attribution
We believe authors should receive proper credit and attribution for their work.
You are entitled to be identified as the author of your work. Whether to publish your work anonymously or to use a pseudonym should be your choice to make. To claim another writer’s words as one’s own is a form of theft.
Ownership
We believe authors should be able to retain ownership of their copyrights and to recover those rights if a publisher is unwilling or unable to exploit them.
Some publishers or publications may demand that you assign your copyright to them. It is important for writers to maintain ownership of the work they license, so that they have some say over future uses.
We believe that you should maintain control of your work if you wish. And we will help you recover rights when a publisher lets your work go out of print or otherwise fails in its obligations.