Artificial Intelligence New AI technologies necessitate legal and policy interventions that balance development of useful AI tools with protection of human authorship. Share on Twitter (opens in a new tab) on Facebook (opens in a new tab) on Linkedin (opens in a new tab) via email The Authors Guild believes that it is crucial for our culture and the future of democracy to ensure that our literature and arts remain vibrant and diverse. Artificial intelligence machines capable of generating literary and artistic works and performing other fantastical tasks that were once “science fiction” are at our doorstep. These generative AI technologies, which can create new content because they have ingested vast amounts of existing literary and artistic works, will have a significant impact on human creators and the future of our arts, and it is imperative that we approach their development and use with respect for human creators and copyright. To protect the future of journalism, literature, and the arts, we must develop sensible policies and regulations governing the development and use of generative AI. We are specifically lobbying for laws, regulations, and policies that will: Compensate authors when their works are used in training of generative AI, and create transparency obligations for AI developers to disclose what works they use to train their AI;Require permission and establish compensation for authors when their works are used in outputs, or when their names or identities or titles of their works are used in prompts. The former can be done through a revision to copyright law that acknowledges this kind of use as an economic right, and the latter through a well-articulated federal right of publicity law.Require authors, publishers, platforms, and marketplaces to identify when a significant portion (e.g., more than 30%) of a written works has been generated by AI We have been actively engaged in legal and policy discussions surrounding AI and copyright. We convened a coalition of creator groups to meet and educate members of Congress and their staffs about the potential harms of new generative artificial intelligence programs to the literary and creative economies. We participated in the Copyright Office’s current listening sessions, and we are consulting with AI developers, creator groups, and licensing agencies to help develop proposals for initiatives that will ensure due compensation for human creators whose talents and hard work lie at the bedrock of AI development. We also previously filed comments before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the U.S. Copyright Office, the U.K. Intellectual Property Office, and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). We have spoken at symposia of the U.S. Copyright Office and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), WIPO and dozens of other forum, encouraging other domestic and international policymakers to protect human-authored works. Click here to read our full policy recommendations. The Impact of AI Technologies on the Writing Profession Today, commercial AI programs can already write articles, books, compose music, and render images in response to text prompts, and their ability to do these tasks is improving at a rapid clip. A wide assortment of tools to help writers write are commercially available today and show great potential to expedite and improve many writers’ output. At the same time, the use of AI in place of human writers is right around the corner for many kinds of written work, and it threatens to crowd the market for human authored books. AI-generated literary and artistic works, even in their most impressive form, are essentially mimicry of human expressive works. AI generative technologies (i.e, AI machines that are used to generate output) are “trained” on mass amounts of pre-existing works (e.g., text, images, recorded music), where the copied works are broken down to their components and rules and their patterns deciphered. The consumer facing AI machines available to date have been trained on works copied by internet crawlers without licenses or permission. While AI-generated works might look or sound like human-created works, they lack human intelligence and feeling. AI cannot feel, think, or empathize. It lacks the essential human faculties that move the arts forward. Nevertheless, the speed at which AI can create artistic and literary works to compete with human-authored works poses a significant threat to both the economic and cultural value of the latter. You may ask, why do we care if human authorship survives? Isn’t this just another disruptive technology that does what humans can do, only more efficiently? Using AI to produce literary and artistic works differs from other uses of AI in one stark aspect. Human communities are bound together by culture—literature, art, music, and other forms of expression. The rise of AI necessitates legal and policy interventions that balance development of useful AI technologies while ensuring that human authorship is protected. We need to ensure that human creators are compensated, not just for the sake of the creators, but so our books and arts continue to reflect both our real and imagined experiences, open our minds, teach us new ways of thinking, and move us forward as a society, rather than rehash old ideas.