Article
August 7, 2025
Writers should be cognizant of potential legal claims when writing biographies and other nonfiction about living people or when basing a fictional character on a recognizable real person. These include claims for libel (defamation in published writing) as well as certain rights of privacy and publicity provided through state laws.
While state laws vary in their particulars, they share certain basic elements. Since most books and other literary works are distributed nationally today, it is best to follow the strictest laws.
Here’s what authors should be aware of when writing about real people. Note that this page provides only a general overview of certain types of claims and does not constitute legal advice.
Defamation is a false statement of fact that is harmful to the reputation of an identifiable person or entity. When a defamatory statement is written (or otherwise communicated in print), it is known as libel.
In general, a libel claim consists of the following elements:
Libel claims may arise even if the subject is purported to be a fictional character. These cases often turn on what is known as the “of and concerning” standard, which considers whether the character so closely resembles a real person that a reader would have no difficulty linking the two.
Importantly, truth is an absolute defense to a libel claim. That is, if the writer can show that the challenged statement is substantially true, a libel claim cannot succeed.
To protect against baseless claims of libel (e.g., where the statement is true or is opinion), many states have Anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statutes that allow for early dismissal of baseless libel claims. SLAPP suits are commonly brought by wealthy individuals as a way to intimidate journalists and other authors from writing about them in ways they dislike but that involve matters of public concern. Anti-SLAPP laws provide an efficient and cost-effective way for writers and their publishers to have these cases dismissed more quickly.
The right of publicity generally restricts one individual from using or exploiting another’s name, image, likeness, voice, or other defining personal attributes for commercial purposes without authorization. Like copyright, it is an exclusive right, meaning that the holder of the right has the sole authority to decide whether, or under what conditions, their publicity rights can be used.
As a practical matter, even though technically anyone could assert a right of publicity, it most often arises in the case of well-known people whose names can add value to a product or service. For example, using an actor’s name or image to sell insurance without their permission would be a violation of their right of publicity. You do see a lot of ads with celebrities touting a product these days, but if legitimate, it is because the seller paid the celebrity, often handsomely.
Some states, such as New York, include the right of publicity under a general right of privacy law that often protects the same interests.
Some states provide for post-mortem (“after death”) rights of publicity, allowing a person’s descendants to exert the right for a period of time after their death. Lengths vary by state: California has a 70-year post-mortem term, New York has a 40-year term, and Tennessee (home to the Elvis Presley estate) provides an initial term of 10 years that can be extended indefinitely so long as it continues to be exploited.
The right of publicity has taken on even greater salience in the generative AI age. Remarkably accurate deepfakes and other depictions of public figures can now be produced quickly and cheaply, creating significant risks of misinformation and reputational harm. This has resulted in proposals for a right of publicity law at the federal level (e.g., the NO FAKES Act).
There are important free speech exceptions to the right of publicity.For example, the First Amendment protects speech that serves a public interest—such as uses of a person’s name that serve a newsworthy or informational purpose. In addition, some states create exceptions for critiques, commentary, parody, and satire, as well as for expressive or artistic works.
Generally speaking, books and articles are exempted as expressive, informational works, and you do not have to get permission from a person or their descendants in order to write about them.
States also provide a variety of legal protections falling into the category of rights of privacy. While the laws vary by state, they generally can be grouped into the following types of claims.
False light means publicly sharing information about someone that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, portrays an individual in an inaccurate way, or generates an untrue implication. The one who publishes the information must act with reckless disregard of its truth or the false light in which it would place the other person.
While false light claims may overlap with defamation claims, they generally have different aims and evidentiary requirements. In a defamation suit, the plaintiff generally must provide evidence of harm to their reputation. A false light claim requires only that the shared information be highly offensive to a reasonable person.
This means publicizing private facts or information to the public at large that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, where the information does not concern a legitimate public matter such as newsworthy information.
It can be very expensive to defend a claim brought by a person who is upset at being portrayed, even if you or your lawyer believe that you will win. Anti-SLAPP laws help enormously, but there will usually still be some legal fees.
The following are common ways to avoid these types of claims:
While our legal team does not perform full legal vettings, we can answer members’ specific questions. Regular and associate members of the Authors Guild can submit a legal request here.
Not a member? You can gain access to our legal services for just $149/year. Learn more about the benefits of membership here.
Event Recording
Getting Your Rights Back: Rights Reversions & Grant Terminations
Rights Reversion: The Importance of Negotiating and Exercising Out-of-Print Clauses
Publishing Scam Alerts